Poverty, destitution, unemployment, crises, deprivation and renunciation. A set of texts

My soul once incarnated in Tibet as a monk of the Gelug school of Buddhism. That man took vows of poverty and bodhisattva vows at the hands of the then Karmapa named Jeszie.
Both the monk’s incarnation and the vows that were taken were connected with spiritual downfall. Not all monks, not all Buddhists decided to fulfill their own vows.
In Christianity and Hinduism, too, there were—and still are—similar restrictive branches; it is enough to mention St. Francis and his renunciation.

Working through prayers and affirmations connected with money, in similar cases, may be enough only for a short period—or not at all. A soul that has stubbornly decided that its avatars (earthly personalities) are to “scrape by” in poverty will fight to keep a poor state of possession.
Working through prayers and affirmations connected with professional work may bring similar effects.Link

If the soul and the person have not discharged the emotions connected with an attraction to poverty, then after some time of relative prosperity, the atmosphere of deprivation may settle in permanently. This often affects people of retirement age with a starvation-level pension.

I propose working through many affirmative decrees devoted to freeing oneself from the entanglements of a poor man, a destitute person.
I list the titles of ready-made texts that are available to all interested people:

Master of suffering. A liberating prayer.
It is beyond dispute that someone—sometimes a close person—was and still is the master of our suffering. They incarnate near us, watch over us, and constantly ensure that things do not improve for us. In my case it was the figure of the above-mentioned Karmapa. What was curious to me was that he is doing excellently financially now. He did not worry about his own vows of poverty.

A stream of financial graces. Prayer.
Financial thresholds and barriers. A liberating prayer.
We may have them very low. After crossing them, some powerful and immediate expense may appear, or a loss of the source of financing.

Financial debt relief. A liberating prayer.
Financial sins. A liberating prayer.
God supports me financially. Prayer.
Why not?
Financial catastrophes. A liberating prayer.
Financial unfulfillment. A liberating prayer.

I expand these issues with further aspects as far as possible and as time allows.

This entry has 5 comments.

• s_majda writes:
22/02/2012 at 18:18 (Edit)
The Dalai Lama prays as follows—I quote after W. Cejrowski. Most likely the invocation is addressed to the demon Mahakali, as commonly happens in Buddhism, which rejects God.
You who have put on a garland of skulls
You who opened your mouth and showed your fangs
You who are terrifying
I adore you.
Answer.
Reply

• s_majda writes:
16/09/2012 at 13:23 (Edit)
Your prayers work; I have already felt several of them as positive physical sensations in my body. I even felt light in my body. In my head I felt—karmically “driven in” to me once—next to the energy channel, a second channel through which the inflow of, among other things, money/wealth is blocked. It is an amazing sensation to find in oneself such MY limitations, ones I was not prepared for. There is, of course, resistance in my body to accepting money and earning it. Immediately a block appears against experiencing that release—something like energy inside the chakras that blocks all my attempts to let go of the blocks. Something like a spontaneous prohibition on possessing: “you’re not allowed, and that’s it.” And I don’t have the money for an analysis of this financial problem.

Because of that I thought it would be worth cleansing my chakras. And here I have two options: buy recordings from you or use the prayers posted on the website. I now have a few questions: which chakras should I start cleansing from—subterranean, physical, or supra-terrestrial; how to formulate the transitions between chakras, especially between subterranean and physical, and between physical and supra-terrestrial; and how to finish the last supra-terrestrial chakra. In the end, I also encountered different ways of counting chakras in several studies—some sources count the physical chakras starting with the crown chakra as the first, while others consider the root chakra to be the first. So how should one begin counting?

Also, the articles are quite interesting; I miss an introduction in them, especially those containing prayers. It’s not very clear what they concern—what problem they solve, or rather which problem they address. I would include links referring to a given problem, e.g., resistance to money or a prayer freeing one from resistance. But these are only my observations.
Reply

Reply:

1. Since I run the site myself, there really are no links—simply due to lack of time.
2. Divine light flows exclusively from Above, so we cleanse in the same way.
3. I recommend the CD set titled Enlightenment for cleansing the flow of light. However, an exact clairvoyant diagnosis can determine what and who is hooking into the chakra channel. Literally yesterday, in a person ill with cancer, a whole package of codings and blocks on the channel came out originating from:
   – the black flame group
   – the green flame group
   – the violet flame group
   – Belial, etc.
   This concerned exclusively forcing the person and the SOUL to be ill with cancer.
   The set of recordings about healing finances is over 400 pages of texts. It is possible to absorb only in the form of recordings. There is too much of it to be read with understanding, i.e., at a pace of 5 pages per hour.
   Reply

• Karolina Blitek writes:
19/09/2019 at 18:28 (Edit)
A fragment of our forum discussion on related entanglements

Mirek: should incarnations as Templars be entrusted to God? Because, after all, it’s noble to be a knight of such an order.
Gosia: The idea is that God evaluates what is noble, good, beneficial—so it’s appropriate to hand everything over. And God, in return, can do with the topics what He considers right. Something we judge as noble may not be so. I give everything to God—also those matters that, in my understanding, are right.
And not in order to be left with nothing, but in order to always have something better in exchange in God’s criteria (or, let’s say, God evaluates something and says “this is good, keep it”—on that principle).
For TD it may be an honor to belong to this or that army. But what does God think? You will never know if you don’t hand it to God. If the Soul doesn’t want to give it to God for verification, it knows better—or it has codings about the beauty of the idea of such an army/order.
When you say “God, we give You all intentions of being happy… etc.” it’s not in order not to have happiness, but to be happy in God’s terms and for Him to show where the problems and confusions in understanding happiness are.

Sławek: In Malbork they showed me soldiers’ halls. For 40 guys. They slept on the floor on skins. So how many gays were there out of those 40? A goldmine of topics, and you write “honor.”
Mirek: Those halls were for mercenary troops or for the castle garrison. The brothers had their own cells. Or their own rooms in the city. Even half-brothers didn’t sleep on the ground… as a rule. And besides, why do you immediately assume that if some men sleep in one place, they’re automatically gays? Following that line, most athletes would be gays and lesbians, because at sports training camps you very often sleep in one hall.

Konrad: Here it’s rather about habits of the soul. Physically too, maybe.
Mirek: Right. I understand, but I’m saying that most brothers, if not all, had their own cells at the castle. So they didn’t sleep with the rest. Those halls were only for the common troops.
Konrad: Even so, the soul was drawn to such environments. The question is: why.
Mirek: You renounced your needs in the name of a higher good.
Konrad: And being among such people also produces confusion.
Mirek: Of course there’s some danger, but that’s what willpower is for—to control it.
Konrad: But in the end those unfulfillments will have to be discharged.
Mirek: You mean the lack of sex and women?

Karolina: Mirek, these are still intentions of fighting and killing in the name of an idea you consider noble. And if the soul likes fighting someone, it will find itself an idea that sanctifies fighting—and the belief that fighting is necessary for order to prevail. There’s a saying that “military intelligence” is an oxymoron. Guess why. Renouncing anything for others is an old Buddhist idea; Catholic suffering-for-suffering’s-sake ideas too. You don’t need to renounce anything for others so that others won’t lack, because resources aren’t that limited. God has inexhaustible resources for everyone. Everyone receives according to their karma and openness to God, and if someone doesn’t receive something, it’s not your fault—and depriving yourself of goods won’t save anyone. Both sides will end up with nothing.
What benefit can anyone have from someone else’s poverty? Maybe only this: that they themselves will get richer, while they trick others into believing that poverty ennobles, so they won’t strive for anything more for themselves—like in many religions. It reminds me of Rydzyk, who received a car from a homeless man… I wonder whether “Lokeś” became richer through Amitabha vows and all the souls who made them to him or someone else. Others gain nothing from your lack, and only you lose. I have déjà vu, because I think I already wrote this. It doesn’t please God either. He probably waits for the moment when the sufferer finally bends and admits that deprivation isn’t comfortable, that they have needs, and asks for an improvement in their living conditions. Not that I’ve “heard” Him, but if He is all-perfect, then giving people and souls graces shouldn’t tire Him. For an omnipotent and all-knowing being, it’s easy. Suffering and deprivation do not ennoble. Rather, it’s punishing oneself out of guilt—for example, from improper handling of money by the soul and previous incarnations, working off the books, income from improper occupations, and the like—or an attempt to punish oneself and impress God with it. What else could it be?

When you look at the self-esteem of many ascetics and their attitudes, they seem to think they are higher in God’s eyes than others because they sacrifice themselves—like the clergy. They think celibacy will distinguish them in God’s eyes, raise them under the firmament, and some have become so deluded that I recently read a statement in which a priest said that his colleagues and Church hierarchy should be kissed on the hands, because the priest is the voice of the deity—so it’s as if he were that deity. Sufferers also want to show that they can endure more than others, and would even be ready to suffer. But it is also a personal rejection of God’s favor, because you send the message: “I don’t need you or your gifts; I’ll manage without you.” Sacrifices that are not necessary are unnecessary. The highest common good is the common good—not someone’s at your expense, or in the case where you want to experience renunciations, no one’s at all, because there’s no beneficiary. Now I recall how I used to pray—I tried to bargain with God: “I’ll give up that request if you fulfill this one.” Because I didn’t believe God wanted to give people anything, so I tried to appease and placate Him that way. But you can notice people for whom many aspects of life go well, not just one sphere, because helping in several doesn’t tire God.

Quoting Wikipedia, the Templars vowed to protect religion. Religion is not spirituality—especially Catholic and Christian in their later form. So: protecting a deity, or the Trinity and the canon of saints. And as we remember from history, armed defense of any group connected with a religion usually takes the form of murdering those of other faiths. Is a religion from which there are not even profits—because it entangles through idolatry—really worth fighting and loyalty?

It’s better to get rid of it, because a long period of poverty in one incarnation results in trouble earning money in the next. Just like John Paul II supposedly said now that he is good for nothing. The more incarnations one “practices” something in, the greater the pressure in the soul to remain in the habits characteristic for them—plus complications in introducing change, because they were strengthened for a long time. Such a Templar, for the next incarnation of your soul, could have created problems with earning money—lack of positive karma in the professional or financial sphere in general. Just as prostitutes and soldiers in later incarnations have trouble finding work, because they didn’t work with their heads. In Patryk Vega’s Politics, there’s an apt quote: “If someone thinks too much, he’s a **** soldier”—sorry for the expression and word choice, but it fits here and somehow popped into my head because I heard it recently, and a knight is a soldier without firearms.
Although what industry or market am I talking about, since we’re speaking of the Middle Ages.

Even with ancestral traumas there’s a problem—in the sense that through the genetic code you carry traumas up to 12 generations back, and even unconscious negative beliefs that hinder success, and you feel compelled to act according to a program. And what about previous resisting incarnations, of which there are thousands or hundreds of thousands, and they also have such traumas? One can feel responsible for thousands of figures within one’s being. That is not a small amount to cleanse.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9F1Fg-3KSTs
Reply

• s_majda writes:
29/09/2020 at 21:06 (Edit)
“Only poor kids read books; the rich didn’t have to.”—Westworld
Reply

• s_majda writes:
15/11/2020 at 11:54 (Edit)
“I watched the program Damy i wieśniaczki about 2 days ago and they showed the picture of poverty in one woman’s case. There was no God in it; it shook me for the first time in my life so strongly that this is not God’s way—that poverty is suffering, rock bottom completely, that poverty is pathology in itself and it produces more pathology, because from poverty various offenses are also born, because there is nothing to lose. Children with no chance for a better life, because parents with no chance, stuck in that situation, accepting it as ‘well, it’s like that, what can you do.’ The program affected me; I couldn’t recover the whole next day. Now when I look at it, I can’t wrap my head around the fact that someone believes this could be sublime—and could even vow to live like that.” (From a received letter.)

Opublikowano: 09/02/2026
Autor: Sławomir Majda
Kateogrie: Money and freedom from poverty

Comments