Proofs of the Existence of God – Intentions for Reflection / Prayer

Technical Aspects of Working with Intentions – Translation

Technical issues concerning the idea and construction of sentences when working with intentions.

Articles:
“800 intentions for cleansing” – Link
“Building extensive intentions and prayers. Skype discussion on technique” – Link 
“One-sentence structure for intentions” – Link

Core Principle

The word (–not) added to a given term means that it is useful to also express its opposite, or even spontaneously include synonyms and their opposites during the process.

Example

– being poor, sick → it is beneficial to also say the opposite:
– being poor, sick, – not being poor, sick

This allows the pattern to be activated as broadly as possible, including its opposite aspects.

Important Note

Souls often believe or claim that they do not have opposite patterns (for example, that they are not idolaters in a given context).

Another Example

A woman’s Soul denies ever having been a bad mother.
Adding the negation (–not being a bad mother) may help it recognize its actual state:

– being a bad mother, – not being a bad mother

“Oh no, never in my life! These are not my patterns. What I do is my private matter.”
(This is very often said or thought by the Soul.)

Core Intentions (Translation)

– our (and through us others’) proving the existence of God, seeking and likewise hiding from ourselves and others the existence of God, and all the effects of experiencing or not experiencing this

– our (and through us others’) demanding proof of the existence or non-existence of God, deities, goddesses, divine mothers, gods, aliens, Goa’uld, etc., and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) creating, applying, hiding, ridiculing, or refuting beliefs such as the wishful-thinking argument (that someone wants God to exist—or not exist—or at least not interfere), and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) creating, applying, hiding, ridiculing, or refuting arguments for and against the existence of God or other beings, and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) engaging with the cosmological argument (that a first cause must exist—God), and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) engaging with the ontological argument (that God, as the most perfect being, must necessarily exist), and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) engaging with the argument from realism (that God is the most real being), and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) believing that the complexity of the universe, time, and multidimensionality implies design by God, and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) believing that there must be a fundamental source of life—God—and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) believing that the historical figure of Jesus Christ reveals God’s existence, and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) believing that human morality implies a moral creator (God), and all resulting effects

– our (and through us others’) believing that miracles prove God’s existence, and all resulting effects

Intentions Related to Non-Existence Arguments

– our (and through us others’) arguments that God does not exist because evil exists (problem of evil), and all resulting effects

– arguments about determinism vs. free will (if God knows everything, free will may not exist), and all resulting effects

– logical paradox arguments (e.g., omnipotence paradox), and all resulting effects

– arguments that evolution explains life without needing God, and all resulting effects

– arguments that God is a mistaken explanation of natural processes, and all resulting effects

– arguments from quantum or cosmological models suggesting no first cause is needed, and all resulting effects

– arguments from eternal or cyclic universe models, and all resulting effects

– arguments that placing God as first cause only shifts the question (what caused God?), and all resulting effects

– arguments that natural laws (e.g., evolution) explain order without God, and all resulting effects

– arguments that a complex creator would itself require a creator, and all resulting effects

– arguments that imagining something does not imply its existence, and all resulting effects

– arguments that existence is not a property (critique of ontological proof), and all resulting effects

– arguments that God’s existence must be proven empirically (not conceptually), and all resulting effects

– arguments that visions or miracles are ambiguous and open to interpretation, and all resulting effects

– arguments from positivism (God as either necessity or randomness), and all resulting effects

– arguments emphasizing human freedom regardless of metaphysical structure, and all resulting effects

– arguments about the self-sufficiency of the universe and limits of control over its development, and all resulting effects

Source Note

The material was based on Wikipedia.

Opublikowano: 19/03/2026
Autor: Sławomir Majda
Kateogrie: God

Comments