Infallibility in Religions
Infallibility, although not connected with religions in this particular case, somehow affected me before the year 2000. The losses connected with it were not great, because God watched over me. It concerned a pendulum and its possibilities, the exploration of which occupied a considerable amount of my daily time back then. The possibility that I might be mistaken in my dowsing readings was obvious, yet the positive results of the work encouraged me to continue it
Someone, however, asked me a question – “Do you always get confirmation of your research? Are you infallible?” This made me think, because the results of my research were good mainly in selecting medicines and in several limited areas of inquiry. But the pendulum gave me correspondingly erroneous, contradictory results in other important areas of life. For example, I was unable to find any lost object
Almost 10 years after ending my work with the pendulum, I can write that the sight of one or several human Souls standing in front of a dowser and pushing his hanging pendulum in whatever directions they please has a sobering effect. And it is precisely these Souls that are the Sources of all knowledge available to the dowser, and not some Universe, Superconsciousness, Higher Selves, etc.
Fortunately, I did not become someone who, without batting an eye, determines with a pendulum the distance from here to the center of the Universe, the age of the Universe, or the number of previous incarnations. For what does it matter that Wojtek’s pendulum precisely shows that Adam has, for example, 700 earthly incarnations, if no one is able to verify it. And another dowser has determined and proves that the same Adam has had 2,305 incarnations. And now we must ask ourselves who is supposed to determine which of them is telling the truth, with such different indications? In the same way one can measure one’s manifested percentage of infallibility, or even the percentage of being filled with divinity. And what does it matter that Janek’s divinity measured with a pendulum reaches 80%, when it is plainly visible that he has considerable problems in the material world and with the way he perceives and understands reality
Infallibility, however, does exist
There are, after all, people capable of moving infallibly within one single area of life, within the subject matter of one particular field of knowledge, e.g. mathematics, chemistry, biology, religion or even military science
It consists in the fact that a given person has learned, memorized everything possible concerning that subject. They understand it, possess proficiency in the technique and interpret it properly. They use intuition. What is important, they also achieve repeatable, positive and visible results from their actions connected with this one specific field of knowledge. Being “infallible”, they obtain academic titles and diplomas. Outstanding individuals may receive, usually in one field, a Nobel Prize or other prestigious distinctions. Such a person may support those seeking knowledge in that particular field and teach others
We must, however, be able to distinguish the so-called infallible chemist/healer/priest from the Middle Ages from a chemist/healer/priest of our own times. Each of them, with their infallibility, possesses completely different knowledge and different access to seminars and consultations with people of similar interests
–An infallible doctor, diagnostician studies the profession for many years. And still makes mistakes that the earth conceals. Yet such a person lives fulfilled, bringing measurable help to those in need
–Religious infallibility affects people strongly connected with a given denomination. There are people and even small children capable of reciting the entire Quran, Bible, Hindu or Buddhist Sutras from memory
This often has negative consequences when thoughts contained in the Books, yet not referring to God, take on a life of their own, becoming manifested in the individual through affirmation as suffering on the scale of Job
A person who is religiously infallible then begins to doubt and deny everything they had previously learned. Atheism appears, denial of the existence of God, following for example the Universe, the Luciferian Source, deities and Gurus
–Rulers, emperors and politicians are sometimes infallible
–Infallible people who meet as husband and wife usually harm their family and children with their views
–An infallible mother-in-law is a subject for many evenings of storytelling
–Those promoting various initiatory practices, extraterrestrials, shamanism, etc., and activities connected with them are infallible
–Drug addicts and alcoholics can be infallible, sometimes thinking that they will free themselves from entanglement by an ordinary act of will
–An infallible cook may be able to create a masterpiece of regional cuisine, e.g. Polish, Russian and French. Yet they may fare poorly beside a skilled Chinese cook. These comparisons of oneself and one’s own knowledge are worth examining “from the outside”, from a great distance and, of course, while sober
–Infallibility in a particular religion is a characteristic of a deity, and sometimes it flows downward onto its promoters like a waterfall, creating picturesque pools of fame, power and splendor at their feet. There are, however, no deities/gods who make mistakes and publicize the fact. Ultimately, blame for errors can always be placed upon another higher-ranking deity, or upon competing deities that unexpectedly grew in strength. Even upon God – the One who gives life. In such a case God is blamed for all evil, while the cause is usually Divine whim, euphemistically called the will of God, rather than someone’s impure intentions
Infallibility, just as among woodcutters, embroiderers, cooks and seamstresses, also affects priests and high priests
A good example of priestly religious infallibility is Pius IX, who proclaimed it as a Dogma, not subject to any discussion. He even issued an appropriate state document for approximately one million subjects of that time. Link. As a person of considerable religious knowledge, he also became known for subsequent dogmas that remain binding to this day
The dogma of papal infallibility – a dogma of the Roman Catholic faith, proclaimed in 1870 at the First Vatican Council in the dogmatic constitution Pastor aeternus (Constitution on the Church of Christ). This dogma concerns so-called ex cathedra teaching. Papal infallibility is to be understood as freedom from error in matters of faith and morals, not in everyday matters
This freedom from the possibility of error in matters concerning revealed truths and morality, with which Christ through the Holy Spirit (Jn 16:12–15; LG 12) endowed the entire Church, and in particular the college of bishops remaining in communion with the successor of St. Peter, the Pope (see Acts 15:1–29; 1 Cor 15:3–11; LG 25). Infallible definitions usually come from ecumenical councils (see DH 265, 363–364), rarely from popes. The First Vatican Council (1869–1870) taught that the Pope is infallible when, as pastor of all Christians and successor of St. Peter (see Mt 16:18–19; Lk 22:31–32), he solemnly ex cathedra presents teaching concerning a revealed truth of faith or morals (DH 3065–3075; ND 831–840). The college of bishops in communion with the Pope, through ordinary teaching, presents infallible doctrine if all its members agree that a revealed truth must be definitively and absolutely accepted (LG 25). When interpreting infallible statements, we must distinguish the essence of the definition from the manner in which it was formulated, which may be conditioned by the circumstances of the time
Freedom from making errors in matters of religion, called infallibility, was at that time widely met with crude jokes in many countries, not only in Italy
It is difficult, however, to deny Pius IX the right to infallibility within the field of his acquired private knowledge concerning this one particular Religion. He could, after all, have known its dogmas, truths of faith and the words of learned priests perfectly. But he was unable to look broadly at himself, religion and the knowledge he possessed. He did not ask the Creator what He thought about it. He did not read the Bible thoroughly, or he was not allowed to understand its content and the idea which undoubtedly is every individual’s journey toward God. Unfortunately, such ignorance has for centuries been a normal and widespread phenomenon, almost a standard. Like the standards of the meter and kilogram kept in Sèvres near Paris. You yourself, reader, can verify this by asking family and friends about the matter discussed below
Sometimes it happens that an attentive person overlooks a trifle, a tiny detail, which a moment later becomes a great, openly revealed unpleasant experience. I will give an example from the field of spirituality and religion
So that I am not perceived as someone who compensates for deficiencies in intelligence and knowledge with talkativeness, I support my reflections with the Bible. Many people today are unable to recite the text of the second commandment of the Decalogue. Indeed, they do not know it at all. I often ask people to give its exact wording, or at least its approximate idea, and even people who regularly boast of excellent biblical knowledge and carefully study Holy Scripture know nothing about Psalm No. 2. Nor are they able to connect its content in their minds with Commandment No. 2 of the Decalogue
It seemed to me that people devoting themselves to God Himself should know and understand Psalm No. 2, in which God says to David: Link
[David] “You are My Son,
today I have begotten you.
Ask of Me, and I will give you the nations for your inheritance
and the ends of the earth for your possession”
Unfortunately, outside Israel the promotion of God’s second commandment of the Decalogue was once abandoned. For many people it is dead, meaningless. They do not live by these principles, since knowledge of them remains permanently foreign to them. The Book of Exodus 20:2–17 gives it in these words: Link
“4 You shall not make for yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above or on the earth beneath, or of those things that are in the waters under the earth. 5 You shall not bow down to them or serve them”
Thus, in the Bible we have not one but 2 sons of God mentioned by name. Therefore promoting Jesus as the only Son of God, and even as God worthy of all worship, in the context of the above-mentioned verses is and always has been idolatry. [“God is born, might trembles”]
The announced Second Coming of Jesus, or Parousia, is nothing other than another earthly incarnation of his immortal Soul. And yet the whole of Christianity combats the idea of reincarnation. Link
What use, then, is infallibility in a given field, particularly in the subject of religion, if it is not verified with God? Pius IX and the subsequent successors of Peter had a chance to change the fate of the world and point to God as… the only God, on the basis of the 2 Biblical quotations mentioned above. They could have made the masses aware that God is one and explained that God is consistent in His words and actions. They could have shown the relevant quotations, becoming not so much anarchists of spirituality, but those who speak the Truth and live by it. Over years of religious activity, an image of God could have been engraved into the minds of millions – God to whom we go with everything, with cancer, with poverty, with family troubles. Yet this did not happen
For how can spiritual truths be verified with God when, convinced of one’s own infallibility, one does not remember God and does not mention God even in prayer. When one promotes not God, but various deities, and devotes one’s attention mainly to deities rather than to God
This post has 1 comment
s_majda writes:
24/06/2021 at 17:41
Infallibility is, to a considerable extent, one of the causes of dullness and helplessness, regardless of the time in which it occurs
Opublikowano: 11/08/2026
Autor: Sławomir Majda
Kateogrie: Religions, priests, sects, idolatry, vows.
Comments