A marriage existing only on paper – intentions

Author: Sławomir Majda, Małgorzata Krata, Adam Żak. The identical recurring fragment, forming the core of the idea, is as follows:“creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times”.

Organized freeing oneself from burdens – links to texts, information about recordings, working with intentions, the bow technique >Link.

Technical issues concerning the idea and the construction of sentences when working with intentions.
Art. “800 intentions for cleansing” Link.“One-sentence scheme for intentions.”Link.
Film “The bow after performing intentions” Link.

The word “–not” added to some word while working with intentions means that it is worth expressing it also in its opposite, or even finding and saying aloud any synonyms that come to mind together with their opposites. For example — when saying: being poor, being sick, it is good to say it also with its opposite:–being poor, being sick, –not being poor, not being sick. This allows you to move a given pattern as broadly as possible, touching different aspects, including its opposite. It is also worth knowing that Souls often think or claim that they do not have such opposite patterns — for example, that they are not idolaters in a given case (in a given word). Another example: A woman’s Soul denies ever being a bad mother. Therefore, adding here the negating form — not being a bad mother — may allow her to understand the state she is in. Being a bad mother, –not being a bad mother–“—Oh, absolutely not, never in my life! These are certainly not my patterns. What I do is my private matter.” [—The Soul very often says or thinks this about itself.]

1. of our own and, through us, caused in others, for all reasons and by all means, including among other things creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and not only that, all of this depending and correspondingly independent of, among other things, the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, trust, commands, decisions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of God Himself, as well as of our own and, through us, caused in others experiencing of all the consequences of this

2. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of all genders of humans, Souls, beings, entities, forms, animals, plants, extraterrestrials and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

3. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others all kinds, meanings, species, genders and forms of existence including active and inactive deities, goddesses, divine mothers, divine fathers, divine sons, divine daughters, divine families, Goa’ulds, God’s companions, gods, demigods, Asuras, Saints, gurus, masters, teachers, Messiahs, angels including astral Archangels, cherubim, seraphim, astrals, rulers, governors, owners and creators of astral worlds and soul trees, prophets and environments acting independently or through intermediaries and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

4. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others physical and astral snakes, worms, predators, viruses, pests, fungi, molds, insects, microorganisms and macroorganisms, reptiles, parasites, symbionts, tenants of our and others’ energetics, as well as from among others all spirits, demons, strigas, possessing entities, mythical creatures, mythical beings and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

5. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others ours and others’ miracle workers of all kinds, healers, folk healers, bio-energy therapists, physicians of body and Soul, of miraculous divine healings, of owners, administrators and structures of various initiatory practices including religious and para-religious ones such as Reiki, of witches, magicians, shamans, visionaries, oracles, of signs in heaven and on earth, of magic, of elements, yogis, tantrics and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

6. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others all those establishing criteria of purity, guilt, merit and readiness, including the enlightened, enlightening, whitening and correspondingly blackening themselves and others including humans, Souls, beings, parts of our and others’ Soul and being, those striving for nirvana, salvation, liberation, redemption and attaining them, worshippers and creators of all astral compressions, heavens, hells, paradises, purgatories, astral worlds and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

7. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others all atheists, agnostics, heretics, followers of Baháʼí Faith, tribal religions, polytheism, animism, totemism, Taoism, Shintō, Sikhism, Jainism, Wicca, Buddhism in its various schools including Theravāda, Mahāyāna, Zen, Pure Land, Tibetan traditions and beyond, and their priests, creators, followers, promoters and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

8. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others Jesus, the Apostles, the Church Fathers, All Saints, the Holy Spirit, as well as followers, creators, priests and administrators of all Christian sects and denominations including Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant traditions and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

9. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others creators, priests and followers of various cosmologies, ascetic practices, concepts of purity and defilement including Gnosticism, Manichaeism, Mandaeism, forms of Hinduism and Persian religions and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

10. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of followers, creators, priests and administrators within the world of Islam including Sunnis, Shiites, Sufis and other traditions and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

11. and our and through us others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of promoters, creators, priests and followers of various sects and currents of Judaism including Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, Hasidic, Karaite and beyond, and our and through us others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

12. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others the creators, organizers, administrators and followers of the so-called new religious, spiritual and para-religious, charismatic movements such as among others Babism, the Baháʼí Faith, Cheondoism, Caodaism, the Shakers, Cargo Cults, Falun Gong, Modekngei, New Age, Realism, Rastafari, Scientology, the Quan Yin Method, Wicca, “I Am”, Ásatrú, Hellenism, Slavic Native Faith, International Intelligent Yoga, Transcendental Meditation, the Divine Light Mission, the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Neo-Sannyas (Osho), Radha Soami, Sathya Sai Baba, the Swaminarayan Faith, Harrism, Confucianism, Santería, Sikhism, Shinto, Taoism, Zoroastrianism and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

13. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of promoters, creators, priests and followers of all beliefs, religions, sects and factions, as well as inhabitants of supercontinents, continents and prehistoric, primordial and mythical lands such as Pangea, Gondwana, Atlantis, Lemuria, Mu, Gobi, the indigenous religions of Africa, Australia, Oceania, Asia, Europe, the Americas and other places on Earth and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

14. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others all kinds of tyrants, despots, sociopaths, executioners, terrorists, blackmailers, judges, lawyers, prosecutors, accusers, lords, rulers, superiors, employers, coworkers, clients, payers, manipulators, hypnotists, kings, princes, courts, advisors, envoys, notaries, secretaries, structures of state, religious and administrative authority, as well as all creators and promoters of various destructive inventions and practices including implantable substances, viruses, parasites, bio-robots, artifacts, and games such as Jumanji, the Infinity Stones, the Rings of Power, Game of Thrones and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

15. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of among others all planets, constellations, the cosmos, stars, moons, comets, asteroids, galaxies, cosmic dust, black holes, suns and celestial bodies, from their movements, positions and interactions including gravitational, energetic, radioactive and symbolic influences, as well as all their owners, administrators, creators, tenants and users and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

16. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of all kinds and magnitudes of ours and others’ amulets, talismans, garments, artifacts, gadgets, objects and plasma, musical, magical and non-magical instruments, including rings, seals, wands, elixirs, herbs, smokes, incense, songs, mantras, sacred texts, plants, animals, divination methods, rituals, superstitions, Holy Communions, offerings made to someone or something, devotional items, images, statues, sculptures, paintings, states of intoxication, sacraments, drugs, alcohols, spiritual and physical ecstasies, shamanism, mysticism, all utopias, escapes from reality or submission to promises of fulfillment, salvation, power or perfection and beyond, as well as all their creators, promoters, owners, users and beneficiaries and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

17. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of all forms and causes of enslavement, captivity and entanglement such as nets, ropes, chains, leashes, collars, cells, prisons, cages, hooks, stocks, octopus-like structures, pyramids, protomolecules, structures operating openly or covertly, temporarily or permanently, locally or systemically, their equivalents and substitutes and beyond, as well as all their enthusiasts, creators, promoters, beneficiaries, victims, guardians, witnesses and followers and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

18. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of all rituals, cults, nominations, anointments, permissions, directives, agreements, oaths, vows, contracts, commands, prohibitions, covenants, missions, pledges, pacts, acts, treaties and other forms of formal or symbolic binding of will functioning through granting binding force to a given word, gesture or act, sanctioning obedience and disobedience, regulating access, status and responsibility, reinforcing dependency through promise, threat, reward or punishment, and normalizing submission as law, duty, mission or destiny and beyond, together with all their creators, promoters, beneficiaries, priests, guardians, victims, witnesses and followers and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

19. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of ours and others’, including licensed guardians, verifiers, debt collectors, mediators, bailiffs, intermediaries, witnesses, creators, founders, security personnel, representatives of opposition, censors, promoters, beneficiaries and victims of ours and others’ actions, intentions and manifestations and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

20. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of all kinds, magnitudes, meanings, genders, races and species including parents, guardians, pupils, teachers, spouses, lovers, children, siblings, sisters, brothers, aunts, uncles, cousins, entire lineages, families, communities, social strata, grandparents, relatives and non-relatives, persons of the same or different gender, as well as from ours and others’ elements of physical and energetic structure, organs, tissues, cells, atoms, transducers, biological, physical, chemical, energetic, clock-based and digital systems and assemblies, their mechanisms of operation, feedback loops and boundary states, and all programs governing them at all levels, spaces and dimensions and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

21. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, beliefs, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of all kinds, ranks and levels of associations, brotherhoods, communities, communes, schools, unions, organizations and collective structures including administrative, military, civil, secular, medical, financial, religious, messianic, spiritual, economic, public, political, criminal, intelligence, sexual, narcotic, alcoholic, state, global, cosmic, multidimensional and space-time structures and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

22. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of weather, nature, the elements, times of day and night, seasons, dates, calendars, astrology, astronomy, numerology, meteorology, ambient temperature, pressure, frequencies, colors, sounds, rhythms, vibrations, humidity, the height of the Sun in the sky, the factor of time and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

23. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of ours and others’ codings, thought-forms, blockages, burdens, patterns, viewpoints, modes of understanding, entanglements, karmic crosses and knots, karmic figures, relations and schemes, conspiracies of silence, planetary cycles, the wheel of karma, the wheel of fortune, flat and spatial geometric figures, anomalies, mirror reflections, fate, chance, accumulations, lotteries, statistics, feedback loops, luck and misfortune, curses and spells, letters, words, signs, symbols, digits, numbers, alphabets, mandalas, tattoos, confirmation effects, repositories of burdens and patterns, markers, ornaments, chips, injuries, disabilities, diseases, emptiness, void and nothingness in mind and life, as well as their creators, promoters, victims and beneficiaries and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

24. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this through the normalization of the role of the human being and the Soul as an object of worship, in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity, intentions and correspondingly their absence on the part of ours and, through us, others’ idolatrous figures, acts, intentions, designs, patterns and habits, as well as on the part of those who pray to us as to gods, deities, otherworldly beings, masters, Saints, enlightened ones or astral beings; and on the part of those who treat us or others as intermediaries to God or to any deities or goddesses; and on the part of those who worship, praise and exalt us; and on the part of those who pray for us to deities, goddesses or extraterrestrials in our name and in our matters, as well as those who curse us in prayers, cast spells and seek revenge in every way and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

25. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of all varieties, associations, groups, circles and ideological, ritual and operational currents including demonic, satanic, luciferian, warlike, military, magical, black-magical, tantric, black-tantric, white-astral, flame groups, the Left-Hand Path, as well as from among others battle shock, pogroms, turmoil, black suns, necromancers, beings of darkness, forces of evil, demons, rulers of hell, guardian devils, Cainites, Satan, Lucifer, Beelzebub, Kali, strigas, fallen beings and Souls, horned and rebellious beings filled with pride and egoism and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

26. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of all kinds, magnitudes, races, meanings and genders of conditions related to sexuality, drive, role and behavior, including sex addicts, lesbians, gays, transvestites, rapists, sadomasochists, celibates, eunuchs, brothel keepers, pimps, prostitutes, deviants, pedophiles, zoophiles, coprophiles, coprophagists, incestuous persons, pansexualists, hormonal cycles, inbreeding and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

27. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this due to ours and others’ actions related to the End of the World, the year 2012, other Ends of the World, the search for God and ultimate meaning, Apocalypses, Armageddons, the ends of civilizations, epochs and orders, our and God’s actions within the cosmic egg and throughout successive Aeons, the creation or blocking of extraordinary actions, as well as cyclical resetting of meanings, responsibility and identity in the face of an expected or postponed end, a new beginning or rebirth and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

28. and our and, through us, others’, from all causes, in all ways including but not limited to creating such marriages, remaining in marriages in which the emotional, spiritual and relational bond has gradually or completely faded despite the formal continuation of the union, and living next to someone instead of with them, sharing space without sharing life, coexisting without encounter, experiencing everyday life in which there is no tenderness, closeness, conversation or shared experience, and the presence of the other person becomes neutral or burdensome; accordingly being victims or agents of the growing emotional distance, in which a husband or wife ceases to be someone close and becomes someone foreign, and sometimes even perceived as an opponent or a mortal enemy, and moving from community to cold coexistence, from relationship to logistical functioning, and living in a space where contact is limited to practical matters, duties or necessities; accordingly experiencing the marital relationship as a one-sided rescue project, in which one person tries to rebuild the bond while the other merely tolerates the presence, remains silent or responds with hostility, without real engagement, and living where the energy of the relationship flows only from one side while the other remains closed, withdrawn or indifferent, thus understanding that the relationship in its living sense no longer exists despite the structure still remaining, that the marriage exists formally while functionally it ceases to exist, that lack of conflict does not mean the presence of love, and silence does not always mean peace but may be preparation for an assault; accordingly remaining in relationships that have already collapsed, not because of love but because of its absence, due to fear, habit or external conditions, out of fear of loneliness, the unknown, change or loss of one’s current life, and remaining in a relationship out of guilt toward a spouse, children, family or one’s own beliefs, and making the decision to stay in the marriage dependent on financial, social or practical factors; accordingly choosing external stability at the cost of internal truth, and living in a suspended state in which the relationship is neither rebuilt nor ended; accordingly reinforcing patterns in which lack of decision becomes a decision, and recognizing that maintaining a marriage without shared life is not the same as fidelity, acknowledging that fear, missions or forms of influence may sustain a relationship longer than love; accordingly surrendering this to God — the belief that staying with someone at all costs is always right — in the intention of restoring the sober ability to make decisions in truth, so that fear is not the main bond of the relationship, and surrendering this to God — the belief that merely remaining together means that the relationship is still alive — in the intention of restoring the truth about the actual state of the bond, so that the illusion of a relationship may be separated from its real existence across all dimensions, times and beyond, and all this in dependence and correspondingly in independence from among others the will, guidelines, opinions, actions, commands, resolutions, suggestions, inspirations, graces, generosity and correspondingly their absence on the part of our Soul, our entire being and beyond, as well as from being healthy or ill physically or energetically, stable or unstable, mentally ill or sound, curably, chronically or incurably ill, disabled, injured, weakened, directly ill or bearing symptoms or karmic effects, inbred effects of various diseases, ailments and impairments, genetic, epigenetic and environmental burdens and beyond, and our and, through us, others’ experiencing all consequences thereof

Opublikowano: 18/04/2026
Autor: Sławomir Majda
Kateogrie: A woman and a man in mutual relations

Comments